As a therapist, a well-structured intake is your first impression of the relationship. It’s also a first impression of your work, which gives the couple a glimpse into what working with you will be like.
While deeper emotional work will naturally unfold over time, the intake highlights the strengths, stressors, and stories each partner brings to the relationship. To write a clear intake note, clinicians should focus on the following (this list is not exhaustive):
Presenting concerns
- Why has the couple decided to come to therapy, and why now?
- The severity, frequency, and length of the issues, and how they impact daily and relational functioning
- Each partner’s individual and subjective experience and understanding of the relational problem
Relationship history
- How did the couple meet? What were their early impressions of each other?
- Any major milestones they have shared (living together, marriage, careers, children)
- Recognizable patterns, high points, and moments of tension
- Any previous therapy experience (individually or relationally) or prior attempts to resolve conflict
Individual histories
- Learn about their family of origin and early relationships, attachment-shaping experiences, significant life events, and any traumatic experiences
- Mental health history, diagnoses, or prior treatments
- Cultural, religious, or societal factors that may influence roles and expectations within the relationship
- Individual experiences or circumstances the client has encountered that may indicate additional history to gather
Relationship dynamics
- What does conflict look like? How is it communicated and resolved?
- Is there intimacy in the relationship? If so, how often? If not, how long has there been a lack of sexual connection? Explore closeness and withdrawal cycles within the relationship
- What coping strategies does each partner use in stressful moments?
Strengths and protective factors
- What are their shared values and commitments?
- Ask about recent moments of resilience or repair
- What are individual or relational strengths that support change?
Safety risks
- Assess for emotional, financial, or physical abuse
- Assess for suicidality or self-harm
- Assess for substance abuse concerns
- Assess for weapons in the home
- Assess for intimate partner violence
If IPV is indicated, the priority is safety over relational work. You pause and do not proceed with couples therapy when there is ongoing, coercive, or fear-based violence, because conjoint work can increase risk and inhibit honest disclosure. You shift to individual assessment, complete a safety and lethal means evaluation, provide resources and referrals (e.g., domestic violence supports), and clarify that couples therapy may be reconsidered only after safety is established and violence has ceased, with clear boundaries and accountability in place.